Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19072.1493526526@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining (Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining
Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining Re: [HACKERS] CTE inlining |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Craig Ringer <craig.ringer@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > - as you noted, it is hard to decide when it's worth inlining vs > materializing for CTE terms referenced more than once. [ raised eyebrow... ] Please explain why the answer isn't trivially "never". There's already a pretty large hill to climb here in the way of breaking peoples' expectations about CTEs being optimization fences. Breaking the documented semantics about CTEs being single-evaluation seems to me to be an absolute non-starter. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: