Re: Bad query plan decision when using multiple column index - postgresql uses only first column then filters
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bad query plan decision when using multiple column index - postgresql uses only first column then filters |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19059.1579187486@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Bad query plan decision when using multiple column index - postgresqluses only first column then filters (Cosmin Prund <cprund@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bad query plan decision when using multiple column index -postgresql uses only first column then filters
Re: Bad query plan decision when using multiple column index -postgresql uses only first column then filters |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Cosmin Prund <cprund@gmail.com> writes: > explain analyze > select R, C, V from LBD > where Ver = 92 and Id in (10,11) > Index Scan using "IX_LBD_Ver_Id" on "LBD" (cost=0.56..2.37 rows=1 > width=13) (actual time=0.063..857.725 rows=2 loops=1) > Index Cond: ("Ver" = 92) > Filter: ("Id" = ANY ('{10,11}'::integer[])) > Rows Removed by Filter: 1869178 > Planning time: 0.170 ms > Execution time: 857.767 ms > The IX_LBD_Ver_Id index is on two columns (Ver, Id) - it's not in "Ver" > alone! Seems like an odd choice of plan, then, but you haven't provided any detail that would let anyone guess why it's not using the second index column. For starters it would be good to show the exact table and index schema (eg via \d+ in psql). Also, does explicitly ANALYZE'ing the table change anything? https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Slow_Query_Questions regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: