Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] quiet conversion warning in DatumGetFloat4
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] quiet conversion warning in DatumGetFloat4 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 19039.1496353285@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] quiet conversion warning in DatumGetFloat4 (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] quiet conversion warning in DatumGetFloat4
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> writes: > On 05/31/2017 11:36 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> However, I grant your point that some extensions may have outside >> constraints that mandate using -Wconversion, so to the extent that >> we can keep key headers like postgres.h from triggering those warnings, >> it's probably worth doing. I suspect you're still seeing a lot of them >> though --- experiments with some contrib modules suggest that a lot of >> our other headers also contain code that would trigger them. I do not >> think I'd be on board with trying to silence them generally. > That was actually the only one PL/Java gets, outside of /sign/ > conversions, a special subset of conversion warnings that can be > separately turned off with -Wno-sign-conversion. Just for the archives' sake: I experimented with this, using Fedora 25's compiler (gcc version 6.3.1) against current HEAD (including your patch). For the core build only, no contrib, I see: 12169 warnings generated by -Wconversion 4106 warnings generated by -Wconversion -Wno-sign-conversion It's not just the core code that has issues either: contrib has 2202 warnings for the first case, 683 for the second. So it's better with -Wno-sign-conversion, but I'd say we're still not going there anytime soon. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: