Re: Getting NOT NULL constraint from pg_attribute
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Getting NOT NULL constraint from pg_attribute |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18959.1535036670@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Getting NOT NULL constraint from pg_attribute ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Getting NOT NULL constraint from pg_attribute
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > On Monday, August 20, 2018, Wu Ivy <ivywuyzl@gmail.com> wrote: >> Why are SELECT query never marked nullable? > Basically the nullability property is used by the planner for optimization > during the joining of physical tables. As soon as you try outputting > columns the ability to enforce not null goes away because of, in > particular, outer joins. While some changes could maybe be made the > cost-benefit to do so doesn't seem favorable. A further thought on this is that really it's a historical accident that the elements of tuple descriptors are exactly pg_attribute rows. There are a *whole lot* of fields in pg_attribute that aren't especially relevant to tuple sets generated on-the-fly within a query, and typically won't get filled with anything except default values. The only fields that really mean a lot for a dynamic tuple set are the data type and values derived from that, and in some usages the column name. [ wanders away wondering if it'd be worth our time to design a new, more compact TupleDesc struct without the meaningless fields ... ] regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: