Re: plperl/plperlu interaction
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plperl/plperlu interaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1890.24.211.165.134.1163123310.squirrel@www.dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plperl/plperlu interaction (Mark Dilger <pgsql@markdilger.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Dilger wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >>> Anyway, it is probably not expected by many users that loading a module >>> in plperlu makes it available to plperl - I was slightly surprised myself to see it work and I am probably more aware than most of perl and >>> plperl subtleties. >> I think that is a bug and needs to be fixed. We have the precedent of pltcl, which uses separate interpreters for pltcl and pltclu for exactly >> this reason. > > If this is fixed, what becomes the mechanism for an administrator to make > a perl > module available to plperl functions? I didn't see any other way to do this > documented. Thanks, > This isn't documented either :-) I discovered this when I was working on a way of doing this nicely and safely. I hope to have that for 8.3. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: