Re: An Idea for OID conflicts
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: An Idea for OID conflicts |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18881.1158620849@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: An Idea for OID conflicts (Tom Dunstan <pgsql@tomd.cc>) |
Ответы |
Re: An Idea for OID conflicts
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Dunstan <pgsql@tomd.cc> writes: > [ some good arguments snipped ] > I like the script idea much better. It wouldn't be bad to even allow > patches to be submitted with OIDs in the high 9000 or whatever range. > The committer responsible for committing the patch could just run the > update script before comitting the code. The scary thing about a script is the assumption that it will make all and only the changes needed. Four-digit magic numbers are not that uncommon in C code. I think it might be safer if we made the arbitrary OID range for an uncommitted patch be large, say eight digits (maybe "12345xxx"). The script would knock these down to 4-digit numbers, ie removing one tab stop, so it wouldn't be too hard on your formatting. Given the current OID generation mechanism, the presence of large OIDs in the initial catalogs shouldn't be a problem for testing patches, even assuming that the OID counter gets that high in your test database. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: