Re: How to prevent duplicate key error when two processes do DELETE/INSERT simultaneously?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: How to prevent duplicate key error when two processes do DELETE/INSERT simultaneously? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18823.1248880981@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | How to prevent duplicate key error when two processes do DELETE/INSERT simultaneously? (Brodie Thiesfield <brofield+pgsql@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: How to prevent duplicate key error when two processes
do DELETE/INSERT simultaneously?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Brodie Thiesfield <brofield+pgsql@gmail.com> writes: > Essentially, I have two processes connecting to a single PG database > and simultaneously issuing the following statements: > BEGIN; > SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE; > DELETE FROM licence_properties WHERE key = xxx; > INSERT INTO licence_properties ... values with key = xxx; > COMMIT You mean they both want to insert the same key? > One of these processes is getting to the INSERT and failing with > duplicate key error. > ERROR: duplicate key value violates unique constraint If they both insert the same key, this is what *must* happen. Surely you don't expect both to succeed, or one to fail and not tell you. > The DELETE should prevent this duplicate key error from occurring. I > thought that the ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE would fix this problem > (being that the second process can see the INSERT from the first > process after it has done the DELETE), but it doesn't. I think you've got the effects of SERIALIZABLE backward, but in any case SERIALIZABLE does not affect uniqueness checks. Unique is unique. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: