Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: snapshot too old, configured by time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18814.1459355852@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: snapshot too old, configured by time (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > I think a safer proposition would be to replace all current > BufferGetPage() calls (there are about 500) by adding the necessary > arguments: buffer, snapshot, rel, and an integer "flags". All this > without adding the feature. Then a subsequent commit would add the > TestForOldSnapshot inside BufferGetPage, *except* when a > BUFFER_NO_SNAPSHOT_TEST flag is passed. That way, new code always get > the snapshot test by default. That seems awfully invasive, not to mention performance-killing if the expectation is that most such calls are going to need a snapshot check. (Quite aside from the calls themselves, are they all in routines that are being passed the right snapshot today?) TBH, I think that shoving in something like this at the end of the last commitfest would be a bad idea even if there were widespread consensus that we wanted the feature ... which I am not sure there is. I think it might be time to bounce this one to 9.7. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: