Re: pgbench enhancements
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgbench enhancements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1879.1153925882@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgbench enhancements (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgbench enhancements
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@sraoss.co.jp> writes: > BTW, running long benchmark using pgbench on BIG tables easily causes > an integer overflow error in following SQLs: Right. > I'm inclined to change abalance, tbalance and bbalance column to > BIGINT to avoid the error. Opinion? No. The problem is that the deltas are invariably positive, which is not realistic (at least *my* bank balance isn't uniformly increasing :-(). I think the correct fix is just to tweak the range of the randomly distributed deltas to be plus and minus not always plus. If you change to bigint then post-change results won't be strictly comparable to pre-change results because of the difference in execution costs. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: