Re: Polyphase Merge
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Polyphase Merge |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18768.1200950012@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Polyphase Merge (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Polyphase Merge
Re: Polyphase Merge |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk> writes: > It's really up to you to find answers to these questions, especially > the first one. Once you've designed an efficient algorithm then the > second point (which I'm interpreting as how you'd go about changing > tuplestore(?) so that things can be read in reverse order) should > just drop out as an implementation detail :) I'm guessing you'll > end up not reading the store in reverse order but arranging things > differently---it'll be interesting to see. I agree --- having to read the run back from external storage, only to write it out again with no further useful work done on it, sounds like a guaranteed loser. To make this work you'll need some kind of ju-jitsu rearrangement that logically puts the run where it needs to go without physically moving any data. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: