Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1872.901118603@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] atttypmod now 32 bits, interface change
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
t-ishii@sra.co.jp writes: >> I noticed that 6.4 client did not talk to 6.3.2 server. >> Connection to database 'test' failed. >> Unsupported frontend protocol. >> >> I thought that we have kept the "backward compatibility" since we >> introduced "protocol version" in libpq? Backwards compatibility yes: a 6.4 server should be able to talk to an old client. You're asking about cross-version compatibility in the other direction, which is something we don't have. The connection protocol is designed to let the server accommodate to the client, not vice versa --- the client tells the server its version, but not vice versa. I suppose the client might check for that particular error message after a connect failure and then try again with a lower version number ... but that's pretty messy. On a practical level, the new libpq is not capable of talking to an old server anyway --- some of the cleanups I made are critically dependent on new protocol features, such as the 'Z' (ReadyForQuery) message. Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Might be my atttypmod changes. I did not make those version-sensitive. > I will do that now. Yes, if we want to have backward compatibility as I just defined it, then the backend will have to send atttypmod as either 2 or 4 bytes depending on ProtocolVersion. Shouldn't be too hard. But I'm concerned that you and I both missed that initially. We had better actually test that the current backend sources will work with a 6.3.2-release frontend. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: