Re: BUG #2246: Only call pg_fe_getauthname if none given
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #2246: Only call pg_fe_getauthname if none given |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18712.1140031169@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #2246: Only call pg_fe_getauthname if none given (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #2246: Only call pg_fe_getauthname if none given
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: >> Right offhand I like the idea of pushing it into connectOptions2 --- can >> you experiment with that? Seems like there is no reason to call >> Kerberos if the user supplies the name to connect as. > Patch attached. After looking through the code around this I discovered > that conninfo_parse is also called by PQconndefaults. This patch > changes the 'default' returned for user to NULL (instead of whatever > pg_fe_getauthname returns). This is probably not a good idea --- changing the API behavior in pursuit of saving a few cycles is just going to get people mad at us. After looking more closely, I see that there is inefficiency only in the PQsetdbLogin case --- in the PQconnectdb case, we only bother to compute "fallback" values for parameters where they're actually needed. I think that at the time this code was last restructured, the assumption was that PQsetdbLogin would die soon and there wasn't any need to worry about whether it wastes a few cycles. If you don't subscribe to that argument, probably the best answer is to keep the fallback-computation loop (fe-connect.c lines 2681-2735 in CVS tip) more or less as-is, but split it out from conninfo_parse, and somehow arrange for PQsetdbLogin to be able to insert the values that it wants before the fallbacks are computed. The trick here is that PQsetdbLogin wants to work on a PGconn not a PQconninfoOption array, and that isn't going to work nicely. I think we'd have to refactor the code so that PQsetdbLogin gets a PQconninfoOption array, overrides values *in that array*, then calls the fallback-substitution code etc. Not sure if it's worth the trouble. The extra complexity of searching the array for values to override could eat up the cycles we're hoping to save, too :-( regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: