Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18639.1153950660@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation ("Alistair Bayley" <alistair@abayley.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: What's special about 1916-10-01 02:25:20? Odd jump in internal timestamptz representation
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"Alistair Bayley" <alistair@abayley.org> writes: > The first line of output puzzles me: why is '1916-10-01 02:25:20' > 2627158159 seconds before 2000-01-01, while '1916-10-01 02:25:21' is > 2627156080 before; a difference of 2080 seconds, or 34m:40s. What timezone are you testing in? Perusing the zic database makes me think it might be Europe/Dublin, because there's a DST rule with a related breakpoint: Zone Europe/Dublin -0:25:00 - LMT 1880 Aug 2 -0:25:21 - DMT 1916 May 21 2:00 -0:25:21 1:00 IST 1916 Oct 1 2:00s 0:00 GB-Eire %s 1921 Dec 6 # independence 0:00 GB-Eire GMT/IST 1940 Feb 25 2:00 0:00 1:00 IST 1946 Oct 6 2:00 0:00 - GMT 1947 Mar 16 2:00 0:00 1:00 IST 1947 Nov 2 2:00 0:00 - GMT 1948 Apr 18 2:00 0:00 GB-Eire GMT/IST 1968 Oct 27 1:00 - IST 1971 Oct 31 2:00u 0:00 GB-Eire GMT/IST 1996 0:00 EU GMT/IST There's a whole raft of comments before that about where the zic people got their info, so if you have doubts about this, take a look: http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/timezone/data/europe regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: