Re: pgsql: Minor pg_dump improvements
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: Minor pg_dump improvements |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18621.1391972103@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: Minor pg_dump improvements (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: Minor pg_dump improvements
Re: pgsql: Minor pg_dump improvements Re: pgsql: Minor pg_dump improvements |
Список | pgsql-committers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes: > The only remaining place we still clear errno in pg_dump is in > pg_backup_archive.c:checkSeek() around a similar ftello call, perhaps > that should be changed to check the result instead also? Agreed; we should be using the same coding pattern wherever we call ftello. I suspect that this code may be left over from coping with some ancient non-spec-compliant version of ftello? Probably not worth digging in the archives to find out. The Single Unix Spec v2 says that the result is (off_t) -1 on error, and we generally assume that platforms are at least compliant with that. grep shows me a couple of other places where the result of ftello doesn't seem to be getting checked for error. Odd that Coverity didn't notice those. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: