Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1862.1443364871@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed (Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@mail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread
when not subscribed
Re: No easy way to join discussion in existing thread when not subscribed |
Список | pgsql-www |
Amir Rohan <amir.rohan@mail.com> writes: > I've read elsewhere that a possible solution is to provide a > mail address associated with a message (displayed on the web interface) > that routes your mail message to the thread. Seems awfully like a here-please-spam-us button. The address would have to be displayed un-obfuscated, which means it'd get picked up by spammers' webcrawlers. Admittedly, no one would know except the PG list moderators, but I think they'd be unhappy about an increase in workload. And before you ask: yes, spammers still do that. A lot. For example, just a few hours ago my mailserver bounced something Sep 27 06:30:05 sss1 sendmail[29150]: t8RAU4Ja029150: <12716.1437746049@sss.pgh.pa.us>... User unknown that certainly has never been used as a mail address, but it does match a message-ID in the pgsql-hackers archives from July. I see no plausible explanation for that except that somebody scraped it off the archives and took it for a deliverable address. This is not an isolated example; I see anywhere from a couple dozen to several hundred *per day* like this in my mail logs. There are ways around that, probably, but I'm not sure it's worth the work. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: