Re: Materialized views WIP patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18535.1361520612@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Materialized views WIP patch (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2013-02-21 14:11:10 -0800, Kevin Grittner wrote: >> DISABLE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv;� -- ALTER clause for constraints >> DISCARD MATERIALIZED VIEW DATA mv;� -- session state >> RELEASE MATERIALIZED VIEW DATA mv;� -- savepoint >> RESET MATERIALIZED VIEW DATA mv;� -- run-time parameter >> >> I think any of these could work.� I'm personally most inclined >> toward DISABLE MATERIALIZED VIEW.� It seems to convey the semantics >> better, especially if you leave out DATA as an additonal word. > I vote for RESET or DISCARD. DISABLE sounds more like you disable > automatic refreshes or somesuch. Yeah, I don't much like DISABLE either. I'm also concerned about overloading RESET this way --- that statement has complicated-enough syntax already, not to mention way too many shades of meaning. So that leaves me voting for DISCARD M.V. DATA, which seems pretty precise. It's a bit verbose, but since when has SQL been succinct? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: