Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
От | Mark Woodward |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18517.24.91.171.78.1139529198.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL 8.0.6 crash
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes: >> When people talk about disabling the OOM killer, it doesn't stop the >> SIGKILL behaviour, > > Yes it does, because the situation will never arise. > >> it just causes the kernel to return -ENOMEM for >> malloc() much much earlier... (ie when you still actually have memory >> available). > > Given the current price of disk, there is no sane reason not to have > enough swap space configured to make this not-a-problem. The OOM kill > mechanism was a reasonable solution for running systems that were not > expected to be too reliable anyway on small hardware, but if you're > trying to run a 24/7 server you're simply incompetent if you don't > disable it. And people say I have STRONG opinions. Don't hold back Tom, let us know what you really think.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: