Re: date versus datetime?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: date versus datetime? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18511.902002588@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | date versus datetime? (Eric McKeown <ericm@palaver.net>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Eric McKeown <ericm@palaver.net> writes: > for instance, it seems I can do this with the date type: > select * from table where date_field < some_date_I_specify_here > However, if my reading of the manual and my experiments are correct, I > can't perform that sort of operation with the datetime type. You certainly can do that with datetime; I do it all the time. Without seeing a concrete example, I'm not sure why it's not working for you. Perhaps you are writing the comparison date in a format that's acceptable for type "date" but not for "datetime"? That doesn't seem very likely though; datetime's parser is relatively flexible. There are a couple of gotchas in writing datetime constants in SQL commands. You have to put quotes around them (they're strings as far as the parser is concerned). For example, select * from ohistory where ordertime < 'jun 10 1998 16:00'; In some situations you may have to explicitly cast the string constant to datetime type: select * from ohistory where ordertime < 'jun 10 1998 16:00'::datetime; but I find Postgres usually manages to figure out for itself that a datetime value is wanted. As far as I know those gotchas also apply to date constants, however. So I'm still confused about why one works and not the other for you. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: