Re: Vacuum I/O throttling
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum I/O throttling |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18501.1062476248@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Vacuum I/O throttling (Guy Thornley <guy@esphion.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Vacuum I/O throttling]
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Guy Thornley <guy@esphion.com> writes: > What sort of performance numbers are you looking for? Without the throttle, > I/O is nuked and other database activity takes an age, and with it, its much > happier? Some people say that VACUUM nukes their performance, and some don't find it to be a problem. AFAICT, it's only an issue if you have little reserve disk bandwidth, which in itself is a dangerous situation for a database that you don't want to pay attention to. I don't want to sound like I'm rejecting your patch out of hand. What I do want is to get some idea of its range of usefulness. > We are beginning to learn that "DBMS" and "unattended" dont belong in the > same sentence. "Unattended" and "running on the edge of your resources" don't play nice together, for sure. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: