Re: implementing NOTIFY with message parameter
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: implementing NOTIFY with message parameter |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 185.1115906963@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | implementing NOTIFY with message parameter (Andras Kadinger <bandit@surfnonstop.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: implementing NOTIFY with message parameter
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andras Kadinger <bandit@surfnonstop.com> writes: > ... I therefore invented pg_notify: Please review the archived discussions about reimplementing NOTIFY using only shared memory, no tables. The pg_listener table causes a number of performance problems, and I think that getting rid of it should be a top priority if any work is going to get done in that area. Your proposed patch would make the performance issues substantially worse by increasing the volume of dead tuples :-( Also, any time you are planning new user-visible behavior, it's a good idea to write the documentation *first*. In particular I'd like to see a spec for how this looks to a program using libpq: what is the API for receiving notify messages with arguments? Can an empty-string argument be distinguished from no argument at all? (Possibly the protocol prevents that, I'm not sure at the moment.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: