Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1846548.1617893536@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pgsql: SQL-standard function body
|
Список | pgsql-committers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 4/7/21 9:50 PM, Andres Freund wrote: >> I've wondered about that too. Perhaps we could reuse the pg_upgrade run? > Honestly I'd prefer it if we could get rid of the rerun of 'make check' > by pg_upgrade's test.sh and instead upgrade the data directory made by > the earlier 'make check' run if it's still there (which would mean we'd > need to stop it being deleted). Good idea as far as speeding check-world and buildfarm runs, but I wonder if we wouldn't be losing test coverage. Seeing the number of times that buildfarm runs have gotten through "make check" only to fail at the re-run in pg_upgrade, it seems clear to me that there is something different about the execution environment in the latter case. I've never been able to pin down quite what :-( regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-committers по дате отправления: