Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18463.977421395@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status... (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL pre-7.1 Linux/Alpha Status...
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> if (sizeof(unsigned long) > sizeof(Oid) && cvt > UINT_MAX)
Hm. Each part of that will generate "expression is always false"
warnings from certain overprotective compilers. A more serious problem
is that using UINT_MAX assumes that Oid is unsigned int, which will
certainly not be true forever --- but the required change will be easily
missed when Oid changes.
Perhaps postgres_ext.h could define
#define OID_MAX UINT_MAX
right below the typedef for Oid, and then we could do this in oidin():
#if OID_MAX < ULONG_MAX if (cvt > OID_MAX) elog();#endif
I think this #if expression will work --- anyone see any portability
risk there?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: