Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18411.1426134907@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving system columns (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: EvalPlanQual behaves oddly for FDW queries involving
system columns
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com> writes: > I will leave this issue for the committer to judge. Changed the status to > "ready for committer". I don't like the execMain.c changes much at all. They look somewhat like they're intended to allow foreign tables to adopt a different locking strategy, but if so they belong in a different patch that actually implements such a thing. The changes are not all consistent either, eg this: ! if (erm->relation && ! erm->relation->rd_rel->relkind != RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE) is not necessary if this Assert is accurate: ! if (erm->relation) ! { ! Assert(erm->relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_FOREIGN_TABLE); I don't see the need for the change in nodeForeignscan.c. If the FDW has returned a physical tuple, it can fix that for itself, while if it has returned a virtual tuple, the ctid will be garbage in any case. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: