Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
Дата
Msg-id 18361.1170789365@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto  (Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org>)
Ответы Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto  ("Jim C. Nasby" <jim@nasby.net>)
Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Jim Nasby <decibel@decibel.org> writes:
> On Feb 6, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... massive expansion of the tests doesn't seem justified

> What about the idea that's been floated in the past about a -- 
> extensive mode for regression testing that would (generally) only be  
> used by the build farm. That would mean others wouldn't have to  
> suffer through extremely long make check's.

> Or is there another reason not to expand the tests?

I'm not concerned so much about the runtime as the development and
maintenance effort...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jim Nasby
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Ooops ... seems we need a re-release pronto
Следующее
От: "Merlin Moncure"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: getting status transaction error