Re: Test suite fails on non-default configuration
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Test suite fails on non-default configuration |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18342.1303168369@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Test suite fails on non-default configuration ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>) |
Ответы |
Re: Test suite fails on non-default configuration
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > // PostgreSQL defaults to READ COMMITTED > assertEquals(Connection.TRANSACTION_READ_COMMITTED, > con.getTransactionIsolation()); > Should the unit tests really be failing based on configuration > options? Well, for a comparison point, you can certainly make the server's regression tests fail too if you whack the configuration around enough. I agree that the above seems perhaps overly fragile, but I don't think you can expect to have a general principle that the JDBC tests should pass regardless of configuration. It's more a question of how painful is it to support any particular nondefault configuration choice, and does it seem worth it based on real-world usage of the choice. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: