Re: Missing FIN_CRC32 calls in logical replication code
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing FIN_CRC32 calls in logical replication code |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18334.1414416633@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Missing FIN_CRC32 calls in logical replication code (Andres Freund <andres@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Missing FIN_CRC32 calls in logical replication code
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > On 2014-10-27 12:51:44 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: >> replication/slot.c and replication/logical/snapbuild.c use a CRC on the >> physical slot and snapshot files. It uses the same algorithm as used e.g. >> for the WAL. However, they are not doing the finalization step, FIN_CRC32() >> on the calculated checksums. Not that it matters much, but it's a bit weird >> and inconsistent, and was probably an oversight. > Hm. Good catch - that's stupid. I wonder what to do about it. I'm > tempted to just add a comment about it to 9.4 and fix it on master as > changing it is essentially a catversion bump. Any objections to that? Yeah, I think you should get it right the first time. It hardly seems likely that any 9.4 beta testers are depending on those files to be stable yet. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: