Re: pg_upgrade and statistics
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade and statistics |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18325.1331611947@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade and statistics (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade and statistics
Re: pg_upgrade and statistics |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Copying the statistics from the old server is on the pg_upgrade TODO > list. I have avoided it because it will add an additional requirement > that will make pg_upgrade more fragile in case of major version changes. > Does anyone have a sense of how often we change the statistics data > between major versions? I don't think pg_statistic is inherently any more stable than any other system catalog. We've whacked it around significantly just last week, which might color my perception a bit, but there are other changes on the to-do list. (For one example, see nearby complaints about estimating TOAST-related costs, which we could not fix without adding more stats data.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: