Re: Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18324.1051657553@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1 ("SZŰCS Gábor" <surrano@mailbox.hu>) |
Ответы |
Query Plan far worse in 7.3.2 than 7.2.1
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
"=?iso-8859-2?B?U1rbQ1MgR+Fib3I=?=" <surrano@mailbox.hu> writes: > ---------------------------- 7.2.1 PLAN --------------------------------- > -> Seq Scan on valuta (cost=0.00..1.06 rows=6 width=4) (actual time=0.02..0.11 rows=6 loops=2) > > ---------------------------- 7.3.2 PLAN --------------------------------- > -> Seq Scan on valuta (cost=0.00..20.00 rows=1000 width=4) (actual time=0.02..0.06rows=6 loops=2) Ah, there's the problem. You never vacuumed or analyzed "valuta", so the 7.3 planner didn't know it had only six rows, and chose a plan that was more appropriate for a larger table. The thousand-row estimate is the tipoff, because that's the default assumption when there are no stats. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: