Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11 beta1 on Debian
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11 beta1 on Debian |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18306.1533167304@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11beta1 on Debian (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11beta1 on Debian
Re: Internal error XX000 with enable_partition_pruning=on, pg 11beta1 on Debian |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 20 July 2018 at 01:03, David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> I've attached a patch intended for master which is just v2 based on >> post 5220bb7533. I've pushed the v3 patch with a lot of editorial work (e.g. cleaning up comments you hadn't). I still want to think about getting rid of some of the "extraneous" bitmapsets and lists that are running around here ... but time grows short before beta3, and it's not clear that that would be appropriate material to push into v11 anyway. > In [1] I mentioned that I think that bug should be fixed as part of > this bug fix too. I didn't include this change because (a) it's late, (b) no test case was included, and (c) I don't entirely believe it anyway. How would a rel be both leaf and nonleaf? Isn't this indicative of a problem somewhere upstream in the planner? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: