Re: Missing uuid_generate_v1()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing uuid_generate_v1() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18303.1286419081@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Missing uuid_generate_v1() (Mike Christensen <mike@kitchenpc.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Missing uuid_generate_v1()
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Mike Christensen <mike@kitchenpc.com> writes: > Yup that's exactly what I did.. I'm on 10.04, which doesn't have > libuuid 1.6 in the software repository, go figure.. Oh ... we're in package-naming hell, is where we are. Poking around some more on my Fedora 13 box, I find I have two different, similarly named packages: $ rpm -qa | grep uuid uuid-1.6.1-11.fc13.x86_64 libuuid-2.17.2-8.fc13.x86_64 uuid-devel-1.6.1-11.fc13.x86_64 libuuid-devel-2.17.2-8.fc13.x86_64 $ rpm -ql uuid-1.6.1-11.fc13.x86_64 /usr/bin/uuid /usr/lib64/libossp-uuid.so.16 /usr/lib64/libossp-uuid.so.16.0.21 ... and some doc files ... $ rpm -ql libuuid-2.17.2-8.fc13.x86_64 /lib64/libuuid.so.1 /lib64/libuuid.so.1.3.0 The file you actually want, on Fedora (and, I bet, on Ubuntu), is libossp-uuid.so.16. But apparently EDB's package was built on some platform where uuid's library is installed as just "libuuid.so.16". Maybe they used a homebuilt copy instead of an official platform distribution? If you have a libossp-uuid.so.16, you might try symlinking libuuid.so.16 to that instead of carrying a separate file. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: