Re: Extension Packaging

"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
> On Apr 24, 2011, at 2:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> IMO it'd be better if the bug fix level was tracked outside the
>> database, for instance via an RPM package version/release number.
>> I'm not sure whether PGXN has anything for that at the moment.

> Distributions may have their own versions independent of the versions of the extensions they contain. Is that
sufficient?

Hmm ... it's sufficient, but I think people are going to be confused as
to proper usage if you call two different things the "version".  In RPM
terminology there's a clear difference between "version" and "release";
maybe some similar wording should be adopted here?  Or use "major
version" versus "minor version"?
        regards, tom lane