Re: numeric_big in make check?

Dean Rasheed <dean.a.rasheed@gmail.com> writes:
> Looking at the script itself, the addition, subtraction,
> multiplication and division tests at the top are probably pointless,
> since I would expect those operations to be tested adequately (and
> probably more thoroughly) by the transcendental test cases. In fact, I
> think it would probably be OK to delete everything above line 650, and
> just keep the bottom half of the script -- the pow(), exp(), ln() and
> log() tests, which cover various edge cases, as well as exercising
> basic arithmetic operations internally.

I could go with that, but let's just transpose those into numeric.

            regards, tom lane