Re: Bytea poor performance
От | NSO |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bytea poor performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18133.81.7.89.65.1129392990.squirrel@fmf.vtu.lt обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bytea poor performance (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bytea poor performance
Re: Bytea poor performance |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hello, Yes, I can understand that, but then why the same app on the server machine is done in 4 seconds? (big difference from 20-30 seconds). I tryed to monitor network traffic and it is used only for 1-2% of total 100mbit. > "NSO" <nso@fmf.vtu.lt> writes: >> Query runs very long: >> Total query runtime: 23625 ms. >> Data retrieval runtime: 266 ms. >> 50 rows retrieved. > > Notice that the query itself took 266ms. The rest of the time was > wasted by your client app trying to format a 23Kb by 50 row table > for display. You need to replace your client-side code with something > less inefficient about handling wide values. > > regards, tom lane > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content, and is believed to be clean. > > -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content, and is believed to be clean.
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: