Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18131.1584982859@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10 (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: weird hash plan cost, starting with pg10
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > While messing with EXPLAIN on a query emitted by pg_dump, I noticed that > current Postgres 10 emits weird bucket/batch/memory values for certain > hash nodes: > -> Hash (cost=0.11..0.11 rows=10 width=12) (actual time=0.002..0.002 rows=1 loops=8) > Buckets: 2139062143 Batches: 2139062143 Memory Usage: 8971876904722400kB > -> Function Scan on unnest init_1 (cost=0.01..0.11 rows=10 width=12) (actual time=0.001..0.001rows=1 loops=8) Looks suspiciously like uninitialized memory ... > The complete query is: Reproduces here, though oddly only a couple of the several hash subplans are doing that. I'm not planning to dig into it right this second either. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: