Re: [DOCS] Avoiding upgrade backlash
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [DOCS] Avoiding upgrade backlash |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18129.1194973903@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Avoiding upgrade backlash (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > Am Montag, 12. November 2007 schrieb Josh Berkus: >> 3) If Robert gets his type-cast backport package together, the location of >> that. > Well, if you want to undo the changes, you don't need a backport > package; you can just change the cast's definition. It's actually not going to be that easy, because most of those casts aren't even in pg_cast anymore: they have been subsumed into the CoerceViaIO mechanism. You'd need to resurrect the individual cast functions before you could put entries back, too. Another little problem is that you're likely to break as much stuff as you fix. An example in CVS HEAD: regression=# select 42 || 'foo'; ?column? ---------- 42foo (1 row) regression=# select 42 like 'foo'; ERROR: operator does not exist: integer ~~ unknown LINE 1: select 42 like 'foo'; ^ HINT: No operator matches the given name and argument type(s). You might need to add explicit type casts. OK, let's "fix" that by making int->text implicit again: regression=# create function inttotext(int) returns text as $$ regression$# begin return $1; end$$ language plpgsql strict immutable; CREATE FUNCTION regression=# create cast (int as text) with function inttotext(int) regression-# as implicit; CREATE CAST Now LIKE works: regression=# select 42 like 'foo'; ?column? ---------- f (1 row) but || not so much: regression=# select 42 || 'foo'; ERROR: operator is not unique: integer || unknown LINE 1: select 42 || 'foo'; ^ HINT: Could not choose a best candidate operator. You might need to add explicit type casts. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: