Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem

Chris Bitmead <chrisb@nimrod.itg.telstra.com.au> writes:
>> No ... portals are a backend concept ...

> Since when?

> According to the old doco you do...

> select portal XX * from table_name where ...;

> fetch 20 into XX.

That still works if you spell it in the SQL-approved way,
DECLARE CURSOR followed by FETCH.

> If the PQexec() is called with "fetch 20" at a time
> wouldn't this mean that you wouldn't exhaust front-end
> memory with a big query?

Sure, and that's how you work around the problem.  Nonetheless
this requires the user to structure his queries to avoid sucking
up a lot of data in a single query.  If the user doesn't have any
particular reason to need random access into a query result, it'd
be nicer to be able to read the result in a streaming fashion
without buffering it anywhere *or* making arbitrary divisions in it.

In any case, psql doesn't (and IMHO shouldn't) convert a SELECT
into a series of FETCHes for you.
        regards, tom lane