Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 18072.1234802639@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: SE-PostgreSQL and row level security
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I'm a little bothered by this issue with respect to INSERT, UPDATE, > and DELETE, since it's possible that I have permission to see rows but > not updated them, and it would be a little weird if select and update > with equivalent where clauses operated on different sets of records > (although that can happen anyway, because of BEFORE triggers, and it's > pretty irritating). It's not clear that there's a clean solution > here, but it's at least food for thought. 80% of the problem here is exactly that the proposed solution doesn't seem very semantically clean. And once we accept it we're going to be stuck with it for a long time --- compare for instance the multiple serious annoyances with RULEs, which we can't fix easily because of backwards compatibility considerations. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: