Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics
От | Scott Carey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17E585DB-FF2F-4281-A5D1-7546829AE16C@richrelevance.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 10K vs 15k rpm for analytics (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mar 9, 2010, at 4:39 PM, Scott Carey wrote: > > On Mar 8, 2010, at 11:00 PM, Greg Smith wrote: > > * At least with CentOS 5.3 and thier xfs version (non-Redhat, CentOS extras) sparse random writes could almost hang afile system. They were VERY slow. I have not tested since. > Just to be clear, I mean random writes to a _sparse file_. You can cause this condition with the 'fio' tool, which will by default allocate a file for write as a sparse file, thenwrite to it. If the whole thing is written to first, then random writes are fine. Postgres only writes random whenit overwrites a page, otherwise its always an append operation AFAIK. > -- > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: