Re: BUG #17972: Assert failed in pull_varattnos_walker() for view with subquery and security qual
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17972: Assert failed in pull_varattnos_walker() for view with subquery and security qual |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1798406.1686686817@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | BUG #17972: Assert failed in pull_varattnos_walker() for view with subquery and security qual (PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
PG Bug reporting form <noreply@postgresql.org> writes: > The following script: > CREATE TABLE t1(a int); > CREATE VIEW v1 WITH (security_barrier = true) AS SELECT a FROM t1; > CREATE RULE v1_upd_rule AS ON UPDATE TO v1 DO INSTEAD UPDATE t1 SET a = > NEW.a WHERE a = OLD.a; > CREATE VIEW v2 WITH (security_barrier = true) AS SELECT a FROM v1 WHERE > EXISTS (SELECT 1); > UPDATE v2 SET a = 1; > leads to a failed assertion with the stack trace: Thanks for the report! pull_varattnos is not at fault here. The problem is that we missed converting that SubLink to a SubPlan earlier, because hasSubLinks wasn't set in the parent Query, so we never called SS_process_sublinks. After some digging, I found the cause: rewriteRuleAction neglected to check for SubLink nodes in the securityQuals of range table entries. > `git bisect` for this anomaly pointed at 215b43cdc. I think this is just accidental, probably an artifact of the specific test case. The oversight in rewriteRuleAction is as old as the existence of RangeTblEntry.securityQuals, unless it was impossible to write a SubLink in security quals before, which I doubt. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: