Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17977.1532362350@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should contrib modules install .h files? (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > Also, let's recall that the point of this exercise is that you want to > install the header files so that you can build things (another > extension) that somehow interacts with those extensions. Then, even if > you put things in separate directories per extension, you still need to > make sure that all the installed header files don't clash, since you'll > be adding the -I options of several of them. In a way, doing it this > way will make things less robust, since it will appear to give extension > authors license to use generic header names. Personally, I'd recommend using *one* -I switch and having .c files reference extension headers with #include "extensionname/headername.h". As I said before, I think that we should change the existing contrib modules to be coded likewise, all using a single -I switch that points at SRCDIR/contrib. That'd help give people the right coding model to follow. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: