Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17975.984714072@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I was wondering if the multiple writes performed to the XLOG could be > grouped into one write(). That would require fairly major restructuring of xlog.c, which I don't want to undertake at this point in the cycle (we're trying to push out a release candidate, remember?). I'm not convinced it would be a huge win anyway. It would be a win if your average transaction writes multiple blocks' worth of XLOG ... but if your average transaction writes less than a block then it won't help. I think it probably is a good idea to restructure xlog.c so that it can write more than one page at a time --- but it's not such a great idea that I want to hold up the release any more for it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: