Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17944.1464790245@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Rename max_parallel_degree? (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rename max_parallel_degree?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> writes: > Your explanation is clear, however the name max_parallel_workers makes it > sound like that parallelising an operation is all about workers. Yes it > depends a lot on the number of workers allocated for parallel operation, > but that is not everything. I think calling it max_parallelism as > suggested by Alvaro upthread suits better than max_parallel_workers. I don't think that's a good direction at all. This entire discussion is caused by the fact that it's not very clear what "max_parallel_degree" measures. Fixing that problem by renaming the variable to something that doesn't even pretend to tell you what it's counting is not an improvement. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: