Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1794.1064494772@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows
Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows Re: [pgsql-www] NuSphere and PostgreSQL for windows |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat <xzilla@users.sourceforge.net> writes: > On Wed, 2003-09-24 at 13:11, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> SRA's Windows port is up to 7.3.4, and I think they just released >> version 1.1, so that is going fine --- and I have the source code to >> use in our native Win32 port, just not the threading stuff. > And if I've paid attention, the threading bits are what SRA used to get > around the fork/exec issues? BTW, I've been wondering lately if we'd not be better off to look at using threading in the Windows port, if it'd help us get around the fork/exec data transfer problem. I'm not sure that it would, mind you, but if it would give an answer it might be a lot less painful than solving the data transfer problem directly. Our main objections to threading in the past have always been lack of portability and loss of robustness. Portability isn't an issue for a Windows-only solution, and I'm not too concerned about the other either, since I'll never think that Windows would be a place to run a production server anyway. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: