Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17937.1136310183@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf?
Re: Why don't we allow DNS names in pg_hba.conf? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > One thing that bothers me slightly is that we would need to look up each > name (at least until we found a match) for each connection. If you had > lots of names in your pg_hba.conf that could be quite a hit. A possible answer to that is to *not* look up the names from pg_hba.conf, but instead restrict the feature to matching the reverse-DNS name of the client. This limits the cost to one lookup per connection instead of N (and it'd be essentially free if you have log_hostnames turned on, since we already do that lookup in that case). I'm not sure about the relative usefulness of this compared to the forward-lookup case, nor whether it's riskier or less risky from a spoofing point of view. But something to consider. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: