Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17935.1214499739@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0 ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0
Re: Latest on CITEXT 2.0 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes: > Datum citext_ne (PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) { > // Fast path for different-length inputs. Okay for canonical > equivalence? > if (VARSIZE(PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(0)) != VARSIZE(PG_GETARG_TEXT_P(1))) > PG_RETURN_BOOL( 1 ); > PG_RETURN_BOOL( citextcmp( PG_ARGS ) != 0 ); > } BTW, I don't think you can use that same-length optimization for citext. There's no reason to think that upper/lowercase pairs will have the same length all the time in multibyte encodings. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: