Re: Latch-ifying the syslogger process
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Latch-ifying the syslogger process |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17889.1336870132@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Latch-ifying the syslogger process (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > While testing this I discovered a pre-existing bug in the Unix > implementation of WaitLatchOrSocket: EOF on the socket is reported as > POLLHUP not POLLIN (at least on my Linux box), which results in > WaitLatchOrSocket going into an infinite loop, because poll() returns > immediately but the result bitmask never becomes nonzero. BTW, I just came across this in Microsoft's documentation of WSAEventSelect: Note that Windows Sockets will record only an FD_CLOSE network eventto indicate closure of a virtual circuit. It will notrecord anFD_READ network event to indicate this condition. which seems to me to indicate that the Windows version of WaitLatchOrSocket has a related bug. We want socket EOF to result in WL_SOCKET_READABLE being returned, no? Otherwise the caller may never realize that it has an EOF condition to deal with. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: