Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17886.1346441794@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes: > As a side note - I'm not sure why _USE_32BIT_TIME_T was removed in the > first place; it was added specifically to avoid this sort of problem, > though iirc at the time we were thinking of extensions like Slony and > PostGIS being built with Mingw for use with the VC++ built server. We removed it when we changed our internal time_t usage to 64 bits: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git&a=commitdiff&h=cd004067742ee16ee63e55abfb4acbd5f09fbaab Possibly that was just a brain fade caused by failing to think about the distinction between pg_time_t and system time_t. However, the code has been like that since 8.4, and nobody complained before. I share Andrew's unease about whether this issue is fully understood. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: