Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17876.1062475598@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken?
Re: TCP/IP with 7.4 beta2 broken? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Can we allow the IPv6 entries to be in pg_hba.conf but ignore them on > non-IPv6 machines, or allow the connection to fail? I don't see a good way yet. The fly in the ointment is that HAVE_IPV6 is set by configure based on the capabilities of userland libraries; we cannot assume that HAVE_IPV6 means the kernel knows IPv6. But if we simply suppress failure messages on IPv6 addresses, we are going to create severe headaches for people who are actually using IPv6. Ah, the joys of portability :-( Anyone see a clean solution? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: