Re: strange row number estimates in pg9.1rc1
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: strange row number estimates in pg9.1rc1 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 17875.1314720926@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: strange row number estimates in pg9.1rc1 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: strange row number estimates in pg9.1rc1
Re: strange row number estimates in pg9.1rc1 |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote: > "Sergey E. Koposov" <math@sai.msu.ru> writes: >> I'm seeing something weird which looks like a bug in 9.1rc1 after the >> upgrade 8.4->9.0->9.1 done using pg_upgrade. > Hm, I wonder what pg_upgrade left relpages/reltuples set to ... Sure enough, that's the problem. pg_upgrade leaves relpages/reltuples set to zero, but it also imports the visibility map pages from the old cluster. If the old visibility map shows the table as all-visible, then this happens when you try to VACUUM ANALYZE the table: 1. VACUUM doesn't process any pages, so it has no tuple density estimate. It leaves reltuples set to zero, but it does set relpages. 2. ANALYZE scans some part of the table. It gets a tuple density estimate for those pages ... but if that's only a small fraction of the table, it believes the zero estimate of tuple density elsewhere. So you get only a small update of reltuples. (The above behavior is new as of commit b4b6923e03f4d29636a94f6f4cc2f5cf6298b8c8, BTW.) Basically, step 1 is buggy here: if we aren't making an update to reltuples, we shouldn't set relpages either. Setting it nonzero changes the implied tuple density from "unknown" to "known zero", which is wrong. I'll go fix that, but I think it might be a good idea for pg_upgrade to think about preserving the relpages/reltuples columns ... regards, tom lane PS: right now, you cannot reproduce this in a 9.0 -> HEAD upgrade, because of this patch: commit 00a7c9014a8fbb7388a807daeba3e0a85b49a747 Author: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> Date: Fri Aug 19 11:20:30 2011 -0400 In pg_upgrade, don't copy visibility map files from clusters that did not have crash-safe visibility maps to clustersthat expect crash-safety. Request from Robert Haas. I did reproduce it in a 9.0->9.1 test.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: