Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 3:28 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> What we've determined so far in this thread is that workers *do* get
>> their own locks (or did before yesterday), but I'd been supposing that
>> that was accidental not intentional.
> Nope, that was intentional.
Fair enough --- in which case, the patch series we're working on here
was broken to suppose that it could get away with removing that.
As I said, I'll make sure the locking is back before I finish with this.
regards, tom lane